Community land trusts: Why now is the time to integrate this housing activists' tool into local government affordable housing policies

A recent study found that housing expenses in the period from 2006 to 2010 were 52 percent higher for the typical household living in each of the 25 largest U.S. metropolitan areas than they had been in 2000. 1 This rise in housing expenses, coupled with stagnant wages in those same locations over the same period, 2 is one of the major reasons that community land trusts (CLTs) 3 have risen from a fringe housing movement to the center of cities’ efforts to provide affordable housing within the last decade. In addition, many cities see CLTs as a way to provide perpetually affordable units, a benefit not provided by inclusionary zoning ordinances that often require affordability only for a term of years. This article explores how some cities have already added CLTs to their list of affordable housing policy tools, ultimately arguing that the current economic environment presents a strong case for more cities to start CLTs at this time. Keeping abreast of the CLT trend is especially important for land use and zoning lawyers because, should the massive city-wide CLTs planned for several major cities in the United States prove successful in coming years, the CLT model may well be adopted by other local governments, alter how project proponents meet inclusionary housing requirements, and revolutionize how affordable housing dollars are spent by local governments. Section II reviews the history of CLTs. Section III reviews 10 characteristic features of the “classic” CLT structure. Section IV reviews the rise of cities’ use of CLTs and presents, in detail, a review of two ambitious city-backed CLTs started by Chicago and Irvine, California; Section V reviews several legal and policy issues unique to city CLTs; and Section VI makes the case for why cities should consider starting CLTs now.